Yes, yes it does.
It will most likely not make me very popular to point that out. But I am beholden to the data only. Not to anyone’s agenda.
However…I will say that before you TRULY consider any school to be underutilized, even the Apples 2 Apples adjusted formula doesn’t have the detailed information to account for:
- Student populations in self-contained special education homerooms, which are required to be no larger than 13 students. The CPS formula doesn’t account for those and A2A couldn’t find this information via CPS or ISBE per school. This could potentially raise a school’s utilization rate.
- The actual physical dimensions of any room used as a homeroom and how many students it can safely, comfortably, productively hold.
- Whether or not CPS total classroom counts are correct for each school.
All of these could push a school considered underutilized, even with the A2A formula, closer to efficient. But I don’t have this data at this time.
Here are the schools considered 50% underutilized or more under the CPS formula. (CPS is most likely to also look at whether a school has enrollment trending up or down over the last 4 years, and that is listed in the data.)
Compared to the schools that A2A has listed as 50% or more underutilized (before looking at Spec Ed classrooms or physical dimensions of classrooms, or conducting a check on total number of classrooms.)
And here are the schools that A2A can’t include in the map. These schools might be missing information from CPS or might be an Alternative School which has different utilization parameters because of its programming. In any case, including these schools would not be considered to be appropriate to include when comparing schools.
Have charter schools or boundary assignments or any other thing contributed to the under utilization of any of these schools?
I cannot say. I don’t have any data that shows the specific students who were attending one school switching into another school, or any historical data on the utilization rates of these schools prior to a charter opening. I’d be happy to map it if I did, so if you have it, please let me know.
In the meantime, you can see the proximity of schools in the excellent visualization of the data that Josh Kalov did here:
We’ll work on pulling in other data, such as SY12 Level of Performance data, but if you cross-reference Josh’s map with the original CPS Data Release, there are some interesting proximity examples:
Like these three elementary schools in proximity to each other west of the Loop.
James Otis Neighborhood School (Level 2) UnderUtilized
Hope Institute Charter School (Level 3) UnderUtilized
Mark Skinner Neighborhood School (Level 1) OverCrowded
If the Board of Education is not considering the closing of underutilized or low performing charter schools, this is going to get more interesting.
Pingback: Does the Data Support Chicago School Closures? | Chris Gelbach